Re-Imagining Pakistan: Security State or Welfare State?
Barrister Hamid (Late) was an intellectual and author. In a talk, he highlighted that for 75 years, the country has been run under a security state narrative led by the military establishment, leaving little room for welfare-based policies.
He pointed out that Pakistan’s political parties, often run like family businesses, have failed to provide solutions. Meanwhile, the establishment continues to justify its dominance through threats of external interference, especially in regions like Balochistan.
Hamid rejected the idea of India’s direct control in Balochistan, calling it a myth used to suppress voices. He argued that Pakistan must move towards a welfare-oriented social contract, warning that otherwise “things will not be good for the people.”
He emphasized historical grievances, particularly in Balochistan, where resources like Sui gas (natural gas) were extracted but never benefited locals for decades. Despite contributing 43% of Pakistan’s land area, Balochistan remains the most underdeveloped province, with poverty and lack of basic facilities fueling resentment.
By revisiting history, from Jinnah’s promises to princely states to later forced integrations, which sowed seeds of mistrust. He underlined that constitutional arrangements were bypassed, creating long-term instability.
The debate concluded that Pakistan’s reliance on a security-first approach has led to internal unrest and aggressive foreign policy. A shift towards welfare, fairness in resource distribution, and addressing sub-nationalist grievances could provide sustainable peace and unity.